Comparisons ยท Updated May 2026

Extension Costs: Timber Frame vs Brick 2026 (UK)

Timber-frame extensions cost ยฃ1,800โ€“ยฃ2,400/mยฒ in 2026; traditional masonry-cavity (brick) costs ยฃ2,000โ€“ยฃ2,800/mยฒ. On a typical 30m² single-storey rear extension that is roughly £54,000โ€“£72,000 (timber) vs £60,000โ€“£84,000 (brick) โ€” a 10โ€“20% headline cost gap. But headline cost is the wrong question. Timber-frame wins on build speed (8โ€“10 weeks vs 12โ€“16), thermal performance (easier to hit Future Homes Standard U-values), and moisture during winter builds. Brick wins on long-term resale (surveyors still mark down some timber stock), structural alterations later, and insurance excesses. Here is the full side-by-side, costed for 2026 prices.

10โ€“20% cost gap 4โ€“6 weeks faster build Updated May 2026
FMB-Vetted Builders
2,100+ Verified Reviews
IBG Available
3 Free Quotes in 24h

Side-by-side comparison

FactorTimber frameBrick (masonry cavity)
Cost per mยฒ (2026)ยฃ1,800โ€“ยฃ2,400ยฃ2,000โ€“ยฃ2,800
30mยฒ build totalยฃ54kโ€“ยฃ72kยฃ60kโ€“ยฃ84k
Typical build time8โ€“10 weeks12โ€“16 weeks
U-value (wall)0.15โ€“0.18 W/mยฒK easily0.18โ€“0.22 W/mยฒK standard
Future Homes Standard complianceEasier (factory tolerances)Harder (needs full-fill insulation)
Weather-tolerance during buildFaster to dry, less rain-sensitive shellMortar curing delays in cold/wet weather
Mortgage acceptanceMainstream lenders OK, some niche caution on "non-standard" stockUniversally accepted ("standard construction")
Resale value upliftRoughly equal in many areas, lower in conservative marketsSlight premium in traditional markets (5โ€“7% on average)
Future structural changesLimited (load paths fixed at factory)Flexible (any internal layout)
Acoustic performanceGood with mass-loaded panelsExcellent without modification

Three variables that flip the answer

1. Site access

If your only access is through the house or a 1m side passage, factory-cut timber-frame panels save weeks of wheelbarrow brickwork. Brick can cost an extra 10โ€“15% in labour on access-restricted sites.

2. Local market expectations

In areas where the housing stock is uniformly brick (much of the Midlands and South-East suburban), surveyors and buyers expect brick. Resale uplift is materially lower on a timber-frame extension in those postcodes. In Scotland and parts of the South-West where timber frame is mainstream, this concern disappears.

3. Future Homes Standard

From mid-2025 the Future Homes Standard tightened U-value requirements. Brick now typically needs full-fill insulation plus thermal blocks to comply, adding ยฃ1,500โ€“ยฃ3,000 to a 30mยฒ build. Timber frame meets the standard with stock panels.

FAQs

Modern timber frame is treated as "standard construction" by all major UK lenders. Caution remains only on older 1960sโ€“1970s system-built stock; new-build timber-frame extensions don't trigger this.
The structural frame itself doesn't โ€” the cladding does. With a brick outer leaf (a common UK pairing), maintenance matches a fully-brick extension. Timber cladding requires re-staining every 5โ€“7 years.
Timber frame, almost always. The thinner wall thickness with the same U-value also gives you a slightly larger internal floor area for a given footprint.
Yes if the external appearance and footprint match the approved drawings. The construction method is a Building Control matter, not a planning matter.

Related guides

Get 3 Free Extension Quotes โ€” Timber vs Brick

BestBuilders matches you with up to 3 FMB-vetted UK builders. Compare timber-frame and brick extension quotes head-to-head โ€” no cost, no obligation.

Get My 3 Free Extension Quotes
60 seconds ยท No spam ยท No obligation